Bag Tax Law Goes Into Effect Jan. 1
Shoppers can pick up free reusable bags at various locations on Tuesday, starting at noon.
Paper or plastic: If you want a bag at the grocery store, prepare to now pay the price.
With Montgomery County’s new bag law beginning today, shoppers must now pay 5 cents for each non-reusable bag. Of that five cents, the retail establishment keeps one cent per bag for administrative costs.
To ease the transition, the county is distributing a limited number of reusable bags (donated by businesses) at the following locations on Tuesday, starting at noon:
• Safeway, King Farm, 403 Redland Boulevard, Rockville
• The Little Bitts Shop, 11244 Triangle Lane, Wheaton
• Bethesda, corner of Woodmont and Bethesda avenues, near the fountain
• Walmart, 20910 Frederick Road, Germantown
Montgomery County Executive Isiah Leggett wil distribute bags at the Safeway in the Hillandale Forest Shopping Center at 10101 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring.
The tax will NOT apply to bags used to carry the following items: prescription drugs, newspapers, garbage, pet waste, yard waste, restaurant leftovers or farmers market goods.
The county expects to earn up to $1.5 million from this tax in the first year. This money will go to the Water Quality Protection Fund (WQPF) to fund stormwater management, watershed restoration and litter clean-up, according to a county press release.
Margarete Levy
11:51 am on Sunday, January 1, 2012
Wonder how reusable bags will fare when condensation and leakage from groceries soak the bags, which will mildew. Could become a big public health issue.
Ed Murtagh
12:52 pm on Sunday, January 1, 2012
I would not worry about that. That is a scare tactic that the American Chemical Council is spreading. This group advocates for the plastic bag industry, not consumers. I and many, many others have used reusable bags for years and this has never been an issue. Large scale use is occurring in D.C. and it has not been a problem. Don't let the plastic bag industry scare you all.
MocoLoco
7:57 pm on Sunday, January 1, 2012
Exempting newspaper bags shows how ridiculous this law is. The Washington Post is often double-bags. In the old days, when I delivered papers, we didn't need plastic bags. Rather than making people walk to the curb, we would put the paper behind the storm door. (We earned those tips that the delivery men still think they deserve.) Anyway, those newspaper bags are just as plastic as the ones from the grocery store, yet they are exempt.
lilkunta
7:19 am on Wednesday, January 4, 2012
ed : No it isnt a scare tactic. It is a valid concern.How do u know that there hasnt been any problem in DC/ Was a study done of random residents bags?
Why wasnt this advertised? Why no revese 911 reminding all M C residents? So we could have made it a point to get one.
Just like the M C council didn't advertise that they were going to have this bag tax. They secretly put it on/up for ballot and passed it, where was the public forum? If there had been I know for sure we would have voiced oppositon as M C's bag tax is far more devastating than DCs. Groceries fine. What reusable bag will hold prom dresses and tuxedos purchased from jcpenny? When it is back to school time what reusbale bag will hold all the shoe boxes?
We need to recall or a referendum on this bag tax!
lilkunta
7:23 am on Wednesday, January 4, 2012
mocoloco: I think putting papers in storm doors is a great way to reduce waste.
But what if there is no storm door?
and with so many houses and apartments I think the newspaper delivery ppl would oppose this as they throw and go, they have to deliver the papers by 6am right?
lilkunta
1:18 pm on Wednesday, January 4, 2012
carolyn: You see. Lack of advertising made you HAVE to buy bags for your clothing store purchases. MoCo's bag tax is well beyond what DC does. You had no choice as you couldnt carry your purchases free hand around the mall.
Retailers already charge us for bags, now they are making an additional 1c as you said. I wish they would lead the charge as Im sure they are going to get hassled by customers when told they must pay for the bag.
FANTAStic qu! Why didnt the m c concil require the stores give out bio degradeable bags? Instead they just tax us consumers, then wonder why we arent spending?
Charging for paper pags makes no sense to me. Those bags are recyclable! I use them to hold the newspapers I put out in the blue recycle bin.
Donna R. Savage
3:15 pm on Sunday, January 1, 2012
It's a shame that plastic bags have been lumped in the same category as paper bags. Seems to me that it's the plastic bags (not paper) that are the target of this well-meaning law. We haven't used plastic bags at grocery stores in a LONG time; we always use paper bags. And we re-use those paper bags to take newspapers to the curb and for our kitchen garbage - for which we'll now have to buy plastic bags! (Or, more likely, pay the 5c for the paper grocery bags.) Paper bags should have been exempted. Those great paper bags from Trader Joe's, MOMarket, and Whole Foods are worth the 5c for their usefulness at our house.
Corbin Dallas Multipass
4:38 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012
As someone who is a proponent of the law I actually agree with this point. I think there's arguments against - would people just start using large paper bags for small items? Are paper bags still contributing to stream pollution? etc. But otherwise I agree.
lilkunta
7:23 am on Wednesday, January 4, 2012
donna : AGREED. This is why Im am upset with this bag tax. I dont recall the M C council advertise that they were going to have this bag tax. They secretly put it on/up for ballot and passed it, where was the public forum? If there had been I know for sure we would have voiced oppositon as M C's bag tax is far more devastating than DCs. Groceries fine. What reusable bag will hold prom dresses and tuxedos purchased from jcpenny? When it is back to school time what reusbale bag will hold all the shoe boxes?
There should be no cost on paper bags as even if they do end up in water, they self recycle.
We need to recall or a referendum on this bag tax!
lilkunta
7:23 am on Wednesday, January 4, 2012
corbim: if we all start using paper bags for small purchases so what? paper bags self recycle.
Carolyn Elefant
9:59 am on Wednesday, January 4, 2012
Lilkunta makes a good point about the lack of bags at shopping malls. I took my daughters to JC Penney on January 1, right after the law had taken effect. It did not even occur to me that bags from stores in the mall would be subject to the ban as they had not publicized it. And because we made a few purchases, I had not option but to get a bag - you can't just carry clothing around the mall freestyle.
I also agree that we need a recall. However, I'd like to see retailers take the lead on this on behalf of their customers. Retailers have much more leverage and money than individual consumers, but they didn't say anything because the law doesn't impact them. Retailers get to keep a penny for every bag sold and of course, they save money by not having to supply bags free. Where is that saved money going? Presumably, into retailers' pockets while consumers are burdened.
If plastic bags were a problem, why didn't the Council require retailers to use only bio-degradable bags? Oh - because retailers and business matter more to the Council than consumers.
Kj
11:51 pm on Sunday, January 1, 2012
The reusable bags still needs to be clean. Soap,water or spray disinfectant still cost money and time. The cycle never ends.
Kathy Jentz
9:27 am on Monday, January 2, 2012
I use washable canvas bags -- easy to throw in with a regular load of wash and then hang dry -- no extra soap, water, or energy used. (Besides, if you do not buy or eat meat, most of these germ concerns are moot.)
Ed Murtagh
12:46 pm on Monday, January 2, 2012
If there is a concern about soiling your reusable bag from produce or meat packages, you can still use the clear plastic bags at those stations at no cost. There is no fee for the use of those bags.
Bella
9:49 am on Tuesday, January 3, 2012
I think its ridiculous! What if you have no money at the time to pay for bags but you go to the store to get wic and you cant pay for bags,what are you going to do,put the stuff in your car with no bags,for it to roll around and break open?
MocoLoco
10:47 am on Tuesday, January 3, 2012
That's a ridiculous scenario, Bella. Seriously. You have a car (and gas money to operate it), and you can't come up with the extra $0.05 or $0.10 to pay the bag fee when you don't have an alternative? Jeez. You're not even paying for the food that you would put in the bag. I think you're just punking the Patch readers like me.
lilkunta
7:24 am on Wednesday, January 4, 2012
moco loco: how do u know bella didnt borrow the car or ask some1 to drive her to the store so she is worried about her wic groceries busting open and messing up some1 else's car.
Carolyn Elefant
2:05 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012
Moco Loco,
If the bags are so cheap, why can't the retailers pay for them? Today at Safeway, I observed an elderly woman who had to trek down to her car to retrieve a re-usable bag. The law only requires retailers to "collect and remit" 5 cents for paper and plastic form consumers. It does not prohibit retailers from giving customers 5 cents store credit or giving out free re-usable bags.
I am very much opposed to this law because I do not think that the County should shift the costs of clean up to those who are environmentally conscious in other ways. In my own situation, I represent renewable energy companies, I run a paperless law firm, purchase the often more expensive (and less attractive) renewable products for my practice, take metro when I go into DC for work, drive a hybrid and never water my grass. Yet I must be deprived of the convenience of plastic (or paper bags) , the former which I use for my dogs. That is why I want to Bag the Bag Law! http://www.facebook.com/bagthebaglaw?v=wall
Corbin Dallas Multipass
4:22 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012
The elderly woman didn't *have* to go trek *down* to her car, she could have paid 5 cents. Hopefully next time she'll remember to bring it with her before going shopping upstairs.
You aren't deprived, you're just paying 5 cents that you didn't pay before. By your own admission, it is amazing that you are willing to pay more for renewable products, give up the convenience of a car, and live with a dry lawn, but not sacrifice five cents per bag or the time/effort to bring some re-usables with you.
Carolyn Elefant
4:32 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012
Corbin Dallas Multipass -
You made my point. Everyone has a different breaking point. For me, the metro is far more convenient than the hassle of driving and I like being able to live in an area where I am not tied down to a car. However, while this lifestyle works readily for me and my family (there's only 4 of us and 2 dogs), it might be difficult for others - perhaps those who have a larger family and can only afford a big house if they move to the suburbs where metro is not as accessible. But to me, remembering to carry a disposable bag is a hassle. My husband and I both work, but since I have my own law firm, I have more flexibility. So I will often squeeze in shopping on the spur of the moment between gaps in my schedule and I won't always have a disposable bag on hand.
As for the extra five cents, I won't pay that on principle. I do not think it is fair for me to have to pay a tax on clean up when I not only don't make a mess, but further, take affirmative measures to impose less impact on the environment.
Moreover, I refuse to enrich the retailers with the extra cent. If retailers had been using bio-degradable bags at the outset (which cost a bit more), we might not even have this ridiculous law. And now, retailers are trying to "help" customers comply by selling 20 cent reusable bags for a special price of 99 cents?! I spend hundreds of dollars on groceries - why won't the store give me 5 cents back?
Corbin Dallas Multipass
4:51 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012
Actually Safeway this week is giving away one resuable bag for every $50 of groceries. I recommend you shop there since you should be able to get at least two free bags if you spend 100s of dollars on groceries. Also, there are free bags being given away at various places - please see the very patch article you are commenting on.
I'm confused, if you refuse to pay the cost and you're not reusing bags, are you planning on traveling to PG, Howard, Frederick, or VA for all your shopping? Or causing a scene every time you go shopping, which I'm sure would take more time?
lilkunta
7:33 am on Wednesday, January 4, 2012
carolyn: thank you!
first, ALREADY we pay for the costs of the bags we get in the prices we pay for groceries and clothes and shoes. Now we are giving retailers another 1c.
I dont recall the M C council advertising that they were going to have this bag tax. They secretly put it on/up for ballot and passed it, where was the public forum? If there had been I know for sure we would have voiced oppositon as M C's bag tax is far more devastating than DCs. Groceries fine. What reusable bag will hold prom dresses and tuxedos purchased from jcpenny? When it is back to school time what reusbale bag will hold all the shoe boxes?
We need to recall or a referendum on this bag tax! There are many who arent on fb, is there a petition on petiton.com? I hope this will work as it was through online orgnanisation and petitions that leggett 's teen curfew failed. i want this bag tax to be recalled. There should be no charge for paper bags, no charge for bags from clothng and shoes stores. Only bag tax on groceries. It is shoppers, giant, safeway bags strewn everywhere not sears clothing bags or payless shoe bags.
MocoLoco
2:26 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012
CE, I am totally opposed to this law as well. I just think there are legitimate reasons to oppose it and ludicrous ones, like the scenario of the WIC recipient. Like you, I try to conserve energy at every turn. I sometimes use canvas bags for groceries, and have never once lost a plastic grocery bag to the wind or the river. However, often I find myself going shopping spontaneously, and am made to feel like a polluter, paying $0.05 to help fish bags out of streams. And, the exemptions (like for newspapers and farmers markets) show how susceptible the County Council is to special-interest lobbying.
Nancy Weber
2:40 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012
Hi Moco,
I have been hoarding plastic bags for the past month so that I can use them as liners for my shopping bags. They will help to keep them clean inside and I can change them as needed. I have rolled up four or five Wash.Post bags with a rubber band and put them in the bottom of my handbag and in my husband's messenger bags in case we make some small unexpected small purchases.
This will take time to get used to ....but I think we can do it. People in Europe have always shopped this way. I have been practicing for the last month and it is not really so bad.
Corbin Dallas Multipass
4:25 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012
http://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/mcgtmpl.asp?url=/content/pio/bag/faqs_residents.asp
I'm going to leave this here for the umpteenth time. Patch should probably just start linking to this directly. Most of the myths that get propogated in comments on these posts are easily dispelled by this FAQ. As someone who hasn't gotten food poisoning in I can't remember how long and uses reusable bags all the time I can anedotally attest that cleanliness is not an issue.
MocoLoco
5:22 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012
I'm planning to buy less. That's my quiet protest here. Sure, I will have to buy groceries. But, so much of the stuff I buy at Target, Staples, and Sears--I can do without. If enough people join me in this spend-less attitude, we'll buy less useless made-in-china crap that we didn't need in the first place. Added bonus--for every $1 less I spend on this, I "cost" the state $0.06 in sales tax, on top of not spending the $0.05 bag tax.
Wendy Howard
5:29 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012
Many stores do offer a 5 cent credit if you bring in a reusable bag. Shoppers and Whole Foods to name a few.
Rjo
5:31 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012
Sigh...another way to "milk" the American public...will it EVER end?
Bubba
6:03 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012
Safeway, once again proving they are being run by morons, require you to do all your shopping, buy the bags, and then you can bag it. This is the self checkout line. I never thought of it as much of an inconvenience, but Safeway manged to turn it into one.
MocoLoco
6:49 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012
Not sure what store you go to, Bubba, but our local Safeway is outstanding, even with the self checkout line. You scan your items, fill your bags, and then at the end, tell them how many of those evil plastic bags you used. If you're inclined to pay for the bags, it's a pretty easy process. And, since you've paid the littering fee, you should feel free to chuck the bags in the Potomac when you are done with them.
Bubba
9:42 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012
Downtown Silver Spring. First day they did it like you say. But, yesterday they had no bags out and you had to ask the ever attentive cashier for bags; which they'd give you at the end after verifying you put in the right number. I don't know, maybe, everybody was cheating on it.
Nancy Weber
6:47 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012
Frank, I have been using Wash. Post bags for a all sorts of things for many, many years, and don't think I have gotten sick as a result of recycling them for other uses.
I am not going to line my shopping bags with them.....they are obviously too small for that....I just use them for a small shopping bag...and put things INSIDE them.
I reuse everything!
Margarete Levy
1:22 am on Wednesday, January 4, 2012
The 2 Safeways nearest me, not only didn't GIVE reusable bags...they had none to sell either. I brought my own, but there were a lot of upset shoppers.
lilkunta
7:27 am on Wednesday, January 4, 2012
See all these comments? This is what would haave occured if the M C council had been open and announced this intended bag tax instead of just clandestinely passing it.
Corbin Dallas Multipass
8:47 am on Wednesday, January 4, 2012
The patch itself has had countless articles about this, and it's in Patch's interest because it was such a hot topic that it got a lot of page views. The law itself was passed March 15: (http://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/content/dep/downloads/20110503_8-11SIGNEDBILL.pdf via http://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/dectmpl.asp?url=/content/dep/water/trashfree.asp) Various groups tried to and are still trying to revoke it, if you feel outraged you should join up with them and see how you can help. Arguably since you didn't hear about the bill those groups didn't do a great job getting out their message either.
Corbin Dallas Multipass
8:54 am on Wednesday, January 4, 2012
correction - introduced march 15, passed in may.
lilkunta
1:22 pm on Wednesday, January 4, 2012
corbin: i'm a faithful reader of the patch and gazette, and i daily watch county cable montgomery. There was no word. I saw nothing about publuc forum. I didnt hear until fall--in september 2011-- WELL AFTER it had passed. Yet I remember hearing when the DC bag tax was first suggested, heard about community dates for input, heard about its passing.
if grocery bags are taxed fine. Clothing store bags shouldnt be and PAPER BAGS SHOULD NOT BE TAXED! They self recycle.
Corbin Dallas Multipass
1:52 pm on Wednesday, January 4, 2012
http://bethesda.patch.com/search?keywords=bag+tax
I'm sorry you missed all of these.
If the county isn't broadcasting decisions that's another issue besides the bag tax, but personally given how long it has been since the bill's passing and the lack of strong reaction against it I think you face an uphill battle.
Ed Murtagh
7:31 am on Wednesday, January 4, 2012
Sorry folks. There were many public hearings and an open vote in the spring. Nothing was secret.
Carolyn Elefant
10:08 am on Wednesday, January 4, 2012
I have to agree with Ed here - the law certainly wasn't passed in secret and the meetings were compliant with open meeting law requirements. But at the same time, the Council didn't go out of its way to encourage community input. The Council did not solicit views from consumers on the potential impact of the law. (Sadly, our Council does not have a Facebook page or use social media as do many other government organizations in other states - it is an extremely cost-effective tool). For example, the Council could have asked various PTA organizations about whether minimizing plastic bags would be a pain in the neck for parents who re-use them to pack lunches. It could have reached out to neighborhood organizations to report on whether dog owners would be inconvenienced. It could have had open forums in the shopping malls around the county to elicit information. But the Council did none of those things.
Bubba
10:52 am on Wednesday, January 4, 2012
True, there as ample time given by the Council. With that said, they were going to pass it regardless of any opposition.
My view at the time was sent to Council members and it was simply ignored. I wanted the ability of consumers to return the bag and get their 5 cents back.
lilkunta
1:22 pm on Wednesday, January 4, 2012
ed: please share when were the dates?
lilkunta
1:28 pm on Wednesday, January 4, 2012
carolyn: It is beyond sad that community input wasnt encouraged. Ill remember that when they call me for my vote or campaign donations.
I agree about accessibility. First the meetigns are shown on the county CABLE channel, and thought it is 2012 not every1 has cable. This always has bothered me wth the homework helpline being a fantastic resource but if you dont have cable you wouldnt know. The visual of seeing your math problem as the teacher is explaining on the phone is very helpful.
back on topic: M C council needs to at least allow us to call in out comments. They meet in rockville in the middle of the day. the working poor cannot take off to go to rockville, but Im sure they can step aside for 5min to call in.
grocery bags i understand.
clothing stores bags no and PAPER BAG tax is stupid.
lilkunta
9:26 am on Thursday, January 5, 2012
bubba: why do you say that this bag tax was going to pass regardless of opposition?
did the plastics industry make a huge donation to the councilmembers and leggett ?
Ed Murtagh
4:18 pm on Wednesday, January 4, 2012
Lilkunta asked about dates: On May 11, 2011 the County Exec. Signed the Bag Bill into law. There is a lot of information on the Council website and a good search engine. You can see from the transcripts that there was passionate debate on both sides. The public was invited and did participate (the word could have better gotten out but many knew about it). This debate went on for weeks. And was covered in the newspapers. There were many letters to the Editor in the spring in the Gazette newspapers About why paper bags are included and plastic newspaper bags are excluded, in politics there is a lot of compromise and in the end the laws have aspects that people will not like. I assume the plastic bag industry made sure that paper bags were included even though from my point of view they are not really nearly as much of a problem. They did want the stores to switch to paper bags. In D.C. they had to include paper bags too.
I think everyone should do a little research on the Council website first before posting. You all might not be so angry. You will see for example that retailers are not going to make any money off the penny a bag they will get. That will be enough only to cover their expenses in collecting and dealing with the fees,.
lilkunta
9:33 am on Thursday, January 5, 2012
ed: I'm glad you admit that the council should have better publicised this tax was being considered. i read the gazette weekly. i have today's here with me now. i read many comments AFTERWARDS in the fall when it was on the news that the M C council had passed the tax. I dont recall comments in the early spring when it was being considered.
You say do research on the county website: if this info was there last spring as you claim and we the masses didnt know about it, what makes you think that now there will be more info/more opennness?
Retailers are going to profit. Already we pay for their bags (they arent cheap white bags afterall, they have shoppers, aldi, safeway, giant, macys, etc and logos/emblems on them) in the item price. Already stores have to remit sales tax to the county and state, so it isnt as if they have to get a new payroll company or accountant to remit this bag tax. That 1c will add up to profits. A detailed study would be nice to proove otherwise, but there is no money for that is what the county will claim.
Ed Murtagh
4:23 pm on Wednesday, January 4, 2012
regarding the council not listening to the people (not sure what that means since many people were very supportive of the bill). During the hearings, I do not think opponents had any real solutions on addressing litter The issues leading up to this law are quite complicated, but basically Montgomery County can not continue polluting our streams with trash/litter. The Clean Water act does not allow that. To make matters worse, much of out litter goes into other jurisdictions. Much Wheaton’s litter eventually for example will find its way into low income minority communities in the District of Columbia creating a costly problem in D.C. How should we address this problem? I would be interested in hearing solutions to this problem.
Corbin Dallas Multipass
5:47 pm on Wednesday, January 4, 2012
Thank you Ed for taking the time to post this.
Paul Hlavinka
10:15 pm on Wednesday, January 4, 2012
I have used the re-usable bags for years. Not because I wanted $.05 back, but because I just think it makes good sense. I bring 4, and that is usually more than enough to package all that I buy for a week. I have had no problems with leaked juices from meats or other health issues related to using these bags. I cannot imagine that if my bags got dirty I would have any problem cleaning them just as I would clean say a counter in the kitchen. Why do folks want to have their groceries put into those thin plastic bags just to be trown away when you get home? I am afraid the logic behind the "save the plastic bag" campaign is escaping me this time.
MocoLoco
8:08 am on Thursday, January 5, 2012
Paul--you used canvas bags because they made sense. So do I! My beef is with the government coercing us to do this, via the nickel fee. Everyone talks about how they use these bags for groceries. Fine. But, the Montgomery County Council didn't just impose the fee on grocery store bags. They extended it to all plastic bags--including clothing stores, office supply stores, etc. I don't carry my canvas bags around with me 24/7. So, I'm made to pay the fee when I go shopping. Every time I pay that fee, I despise our leaders a little bit more. I just wish this county weren't so reliably Democrat so that those leaders would fear a little bit for their jobs.
lilkunta
9:35 am on Thursday, January 5, 2012
moco loco: exactly! It is shoppers giant safeway aldi bags on the roads, not staples office depot macys jcpenny etc. The bag tax should be for groceries stores only.
The paper bag tax needs to be totally repealed.
Carolyn Elefant
9:36 am on Thursday, January 5, 2012
Moco,
I feel exactly the same way. My beef is that I have always recycled the plastic bags. Before I had kids and dogs and commuted to DC each day, I used the bags to pack my lunch - and my husband and I would dispose of extras at the recycling cans at Giant or Safeway. After I had kids, disposed of diapers and pack lunches and now with two dogs, I use the bags for waste.
Maybe canvas bags work for groceries - but they are a hassle for anything else. I never used lunch boxes/sacks with my girls because they either lose them on the bus or get so dirty that they have to be washed (and therefore use soap and water). As others have pointed out, it is problematic to carry clothing purchases in a canvas bag.
Also, I would be curious to see how many working parents, particularly moms really support this law (no offense, but moms often bear the brunt of shopping and childcare responsibilities; yes, this is a generalization). I realize that in and of itself, it does not sound inconvenient to take a canvas bag to a grocery store or leave it in the trunk. But if you are trying to finish your shopping with a 2 year old and race off to pick up a 4 year old from pre-school and leave your bag in the car, what are the chances that you are going to trek out to the garage to retrieve it.
Finally, why shouldn't RETAILERS bear any impact. Retailers could have said "look, we'll get bio-degradable bags." Retailers could have offered to give customers 5 cents back and didnt do that
Ed Murtagh
7:13 pm on Thursday, January 5, 2012
About the earlier posting about feeling coerced into not using plastic bags. Being coerced means being forced to do something. If a typical person here uses 40 to 60 plastic bags a month. (I have no idea if this is accurate but in the ball park I would say), that will cost you two or three dollars a month. This is an inconvenience, not coercion. On the other hand if I were to decide that I was totally fed up with paying taxes to subsidize the disposable plastics lifestyle (it costs millions of taxpayer dollars a year and growing) my wages would be garnished or my house would be taken and sold to pay for those taxes. That is coercion. I think you should be free to use plastic disposables, but I don’t think I should have to subsidize that life style ( I will still be subsidizing the use of plastic bottles, Styrofoam etc…………. that is enough for me ) also just because you dont litter does not mean you are not contributing to the problem inadvertently. On Monday it was trash day in our community. It was very windy the night before and plastic trash was all over the place. Much of it was blown into the stormdrains and are now on their way to Sligo Creek.