patching...
Breaking: Longshot Oxbow Wins Preakness Stakes »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Montgomery Lawmakers Push Panhandling Ban

Some state legislators are looking to crack down on panhandling.

 

By Brandon Cooper, Capital News Service

Vanita Smith sat in the grassy median of New Hampshire Avenue, her body balled-up underneath her blue poncho to keep warm.  

When the traffic light at Lockwood Drive turned red, she uncoiled herself and showed drivers her sign—"Homeless. Hungry."—and walked past their cars.

Over four hours, she said, she usually makes between $20 and $25.

But there's a cost, too.

"You lose your self-esteem out here," she said on Monday.

If three state legislators get their way, it will be harder for homeless people like Smith, 40, to earn money panhandling in Montgomery County.

Following the failure of a move to restrict the practice in the state legislature earlier this year, Delegate Anne Kaiser, D-Montgomery, Delegate Aruna Miller, D-Montgomery, and Sen. Jamie B. Raskin, D-Montgomery, plan to file bills during next year's session to crack down on panhandling in Montgomery County.

Kaiser's bill would allow the Montgomery County Council to implement a system requiring anyone asking for money on local streets—including homeless people, youth sports teams and police and firefighters—to obtain a permit. Miller's and Raskin's bills would leave it up to the council to either require permits or ban panhandling outright.

"[I'm] giving the county council the flexibility to create a permit system to train panhandlers," Kaiser said, adding that regulations were needed to ensure the safety of panhandlers on busy roads.  

Miller and Raskin could not be reached for comment.

In February, Kaiser and Raskin introduced a bill to regulate panhandling, but withdrew the legislation before it was put to a final vote.

The issue has divided organizations that help the homeless in Montgomery County.

Some advocates said banning panhandling or requiring a permit would criminalize homelessness.

"If you dig deep enough, [banning panhandling is] a thinly veiled attempt to try to control the behavior of homeless people and ultimately lessen the number of them in your community," said Neil Donovan, the executive director of the National Coalition for the Homeless.

Homeless people will have a harder time obtaining a panhandling permit than police, firefighters or charitable organizations, he said.

But homeless advocates who support panhandling restrictions said that limiting the practice would force homeless people to obtain a more sustainable means of support.

"Giving money to a panhandler keeps them in one place," said Susan Kirk, executive direction of Bethesda Cares, a non-profit that provides services to the homeless. "It does nothing to help them move forward."

Kirk also said drivers often assume panhandlers are homeless when they are just pretending to be.

"A lot of panhandlers do have homes and are preying on people's view of the homeless," she said. "You feel good, but there's no way in knowing what the person's needs are."

Julie Maltzman, deputy director for programs at the Montgomery County Coalition for the Homeless, said there's an easier way for citizens to combat panhandling.

"To end panhandling, don't give people money on the streets," she said. "Criminalizing it—what does that achieve? ... Is that a great use of our police resources?"

If panhandling is banned in Montgomery County, it would follow in the footsteps of seven other counties in Maryland that have banned the practice, including neighboring Frederick County and Prince George's County.

 

Related Topics: Homelessness and panhandling

Louis Wilen

1:59 pm on Wednesday, November 23, 2011

According to their most recent IRS form 990, Neil Donovan's National Coalition for the Homeless spent received $393,232 in income, and spent every penny of it on salaries, professional fees, travel and conferences, office rent, printing, postage, and other business expenses. Not a penny of their income went to directly help a homeless person. Of Mr. Donovan received $55,417 -- nearly 15% of this so-called charitable organization's income -- as income for his own personal use.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Timothy

2:59 pm on Wednesday, November 23, 2011

Mr. Wilen, perhaps it would be better if you let readers of the article use the hyperlinks in it to take them to the Coalition's website. That will give them a fuller picture. As I read the Form 990, Mr. Donovan is the only paid employee of the Coalition, he works a 40 hour week, and is paid about $25 per hour. That's it. And it is not surprising that an organization that is not designed to provide direct support to individual homeless people hasn't done so. When you say that Mr. Donovan received nearly 15% of the organization's income as "income for his own personal use", you are talking about his salary. I had never heard of the Coalition or Mr. Donovan before, but I hope other readers will inform themselves firsthand. Thanks

Louis Wilen

3:44 pm on Wednesday, November 23, 2011

Timothy, that's a very good idea. The latest form 990 can be found at:

http://www.nationalhomeless.org/about_us/NCH_2010_990.pdf

It's always a good idea to review the IRS 990 for any organization to which you are considering making a contribution. The 990 forms can be found on guidestar.com (free registration required) and several other websites, or can be obtained from the charity of interest.

Also -- when contributing to Coalition via their website, keep in mind that your contribution actually goes to the "Network for Good", which may or may not forward your entire contribution to the Coalition. A small clickable box on the website, easy to miss, provides the following explanation:

"Network for Good is a "donor-advised fund," which is a nonprofit 501(c)3 organization that collects contributions from donors and distributes those contributions to other nonprofit 501(c)3 organizations in good standing with the IRS as recommended by you, the donor. Your credit card statement therefore lists Network for Good and not the charity on this page because your donation is to our donor-advised fund. Network for Good then forwards the contribution to your charity on your behalf. As required by the IRS, Network for Good has exclusive legal control over donations to our donor-advised fund. All donations are final and may not be refunded."

Reply

Louis Wilen

4:10 pm on Wednesday, November 23, 2011

Furthermore, the "Network for Good" takes a 4% commission from each contribution. The top executives of "Network for Good" receive salaries of well over $100,000 per year, according to their form 990.

Reply

Jack Crawford

12:00 pm on Thursday, November 24, 2011

Ha ha, have you read the book, published 40 years ago, "Poverty is Where The Money Is?" See the charity navigator to see the incredible salaries the honcho's make. BTW I would not call panhandling "earning" money. That is a perversion of a very moral term.

Reply

Native

12:20 pm on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Panhandling is part of life in the city that's been around as long as I can remember. Begging in median strips is a fairly recent phenomena that is dangerous. It distracts drivers and the beggars are in harm's way. It should be illegal for safety reasons the same as jaywalking. I believe aggressive panhandling is already illegal. Most panhandlers that I encounter are benign and can be ignored by pedestrians if they do not wish to give away their cash. Making panhandlers get permits is ridiculous. People living on the bottom of society shouldn't need permits to beg. The bureaucratic mentality of Montgomery County is astounding.

Reply

Leave a comment