White Knuckle Parenting: Wheaton Regional Playground—Terrific or Terrifying?
My family finally got a chance to check out Wheaton Regional's renovated playground. My kids had a blast. I had a panic attack.
Let's talk about Wheaton Regional Park, shall we? Now, I know that the renovated playground over there opened at the end of September, but I didn't get a chance to visit with my kids until a couple of weeks ago.
The first thing I want to say is that my kids had a blast. There are giant slides, a climbing mound, swings, a climbing web, plentiful sand, and more than enough playground equipment to keep my three children happy for hours.
I, on the other hand, nearly had a panic attack. The playground seemed intentionally designed to help kids escape from their parents. For instance, there is a giant, fenced, raised boardwalk bisecting the playground. Its sole purpose seems to be to obstruct parents' view of their kids and to provide child-sized escape routes for those same kids.
Like that cement pipe in the photo above that runs under the walkway. That seems like a good habit to encourage—stuffing ourselves into ground level pipes.
I remember back in the day when the playground at Wheaton Regional was made entirely out of splintery wood, metal slides, and that dangerously long blue slide. It was awesome. It was also a little intense to go there with my three kids because at the time they were younger and didn't stick together and I tended to lose track of them and I always joked that if I were a kidnapper, Wheaton Regional was the first place I would show up. (I'm the mom that makes inappropriate jokes at inappropriate times.)
I have to say, though, that I think they managed to make it worse.
I wrote about this over at my personal blog the other day and I got some mixed reactions. Some people were all, "Yeah. I KNOW." and some people were all, "I find your parenting irresponsible. How dare you make an effort to keep an eye on your kids in a public place? You are one step away from being abusive."
I'm not kidding. I was called "oppressively observant" in the comment section. I didn't even know what that means.
I have a 10-year-old whom I gave up on trying to keep track of entirely. I figured that he was the least likely to wander off. That is the price of competence. Sorry, oldest kid. My 6-year-old needs supervision because, well, he is the most likely to ricochet off of the six-foot drop disguised as a climbing wall. We're saving our money to send him to clown college.
Then there is my 8-year-old. He is autistic and he doesn't seek out a parent when he suddenly decides that he wants to go see what is on the other side of the train tracks on the other side of the park. Trust me, once you've had to call 911 because your kid slipped away from you, you don't want to have to do it again. Not to mention that when you have a kid with communication difficulties, it's a good idea to hang out near him to facilitate conversation between him and other children. Otherwise someone is going to end up in tears—and it's not always me.
My reality is that I have to keep eyes on most of my kids most of the time. I don't, you know, make them hold my hand at the park, but I can't sit down and read a magazine—or carry on a coherent conversation with another adult. It occurred to me at some point that we should have arranged a meeting spot so our kids could always know where to find us. Unfortunately "at some point" was long after we had returned home.
I'll probably go back to this playground, but not with three kids by myself, because it is literally (and I mean that in the most literal sense) impossible to keep track of multiple kids at that place.
I did some extensive research (read: quickly Googled) the park and came up with maybe the greatest quote ever on Montgomery Parks' very own website: "The playground promises to be so much fun that we wish adults could enjoy it too!" Me too, Montgomery Parks. Me too.
I am dying to know what you think about the playground. Am I crazy for being flipped out over this place? Am I really oppressively observant? Maybe I'm viciously vigilant? Maybe I didn't find that magic observation point where I could see the whole park? Or am I right and this is the most terrifying park in the history of parks?
Jean, a.k.a. Stimey, writes a personal blog at Stimeyland. Check it out for far more detail about her afternoon at Wheaton Regional. She also runs an autism-events website for Montgomery County, Maryland, at AutMont; and a column called Autism Unexpected in the Washington Times Communities. You can find her on Twitter as @Stimey.
Shawn Punga
12:24 pm on Tuesday, January 17, 2012
I've taken my 3 year old there and not had any issues. I don't mind chasing her around and don't find the lay out to be that difficult to get around. It does challenge you to get up and follow them around as you can't see the entire park from any one vantage, but that has always been the case @ Wheaton: It's a large space with a large elevation change in the middle. I believe they made the best use of what was there and the ramp/walkway in the middle appears to be for the benefit of those who require wheelchair access.
Jean Winegardner
8:47 pm on Tuesday, January 17, 2012
Here's the thing. I have THREE kids. I do get up and follow them around, but it is physically impossible to follow three kids. And this park makes it difficult to even watch them all.
Roma
2:07 pm on Tuesday, January 17, 2012
I do not like the fact that I have to walk _all the way around the fencing_ to get to my son after he comes down the slides and I certainly do not care for the holes in the fencing where he's tried to jump down the cement wall, either.
Jean Winegardner
8:50 pm on Tuesday, January 17, 2012
Yeah. Those holes in the fence. They are troubling.
Sue
3:25 pm on Tuesday, January 17, 2012
I haven't been there yet and can only rely on your pictures and description, but I have the same issues as you. I have 4 kids, two of whom need minimal supervision, one who needs closer supervision and one who needs helps and is prone to wandering. I didn't go to the old Wheaton Regional very often because of the layout, and it doesn't look like I'll be going any more often now.
Jean Winegardner
8:54 pm on Tuesday, January 17, 2012
Maybe you and I can find some childless friends, assign one kid to each of them, then all go together. :)
Tom Termini
5:39 pm on Tuesday, January 17, 2012
The playground at Wheaton Regional Park is awesome! There's nothing like seeing my kids running around like little insane penguins with mobs of other kids. Posh on all you scardy-cat parents who won't let your kids take chances. My kids will be eating your kids' proverbial lunches, in the grown-up world. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/19/science/19tierney.html
Jean Winegardner
8:49 pm on Tuesday, January 17, 2012
That's a little antagonistic. Please don't teach your kids to take my kids' lunches.
I let my kids run and play. Of course I do. I just like to know where they are when they do it.
Amanda Guyton
10:51 pm on Tuesday, January 17, 2012
Since I have actually met Jean's kids, I'm going to assume your kids don't have the same issues, or the same need for close supervision as hers- and mine- do. I'm glad your kids are able to enjoy that park. Just hope you aren't on one side of that fence when one of your kids breaks an ankle on the other side.
Sue
7:56 pm on Tuesday, January 17, 2012
So that's a polite way to disagree. Hmm.
Tom Termini
7:59 pm on Tuesday, January 17, 2012
Just sayin... politely... helicoptering is not going to make for very strong/independent/self-actualized offspring. IMHO.
Wheaton Regional offers an excellent opportunity for kids to get outside, to interact with each other, and to be, well, sort-of-unsupervised. But don't take my word for it, do a little reading... http://www.generationyouthissues.org.uk/campaigns/free_play/The%20Importance%20of%20Unsupervised%20Play.htm
Jean Winegardner
8:50 pm on Tuesday, January 17, 2012
I would argue that a more well-planned playground offers kids the opportunity to be LESS helicopter-parented, because then parents can stand back and watch their kids, instead of frantically chasing them around and trying to make sure none of them have departed for the parking lot.
Tom Termini
8:57 pm on Tuesday, January 17, 2012
Ah well, life isn't always fruit smoothies and Wii. My three kids seem to be figuring out the nuances of playground interactions. If you choose to interpret my comments as antogonistic, you are missing the point -- I'm merely putting forth an alternate view, that challenging one's offspring and letting them "off the leash" can be beneficial in stretching their boundaries. If you find challenges to your world view antagonistic, you might be a little thin-skinned for the Internet. Are you even reading the links I'm including in my comments? Oh, well. Bon apatite, my children. Lunch is served.
Jean Winegardner
9:08 pm on Tuesday, January 17, 2012
I do fully understand the importance of giving my kids independence, and I do. I'm not suggesting that I hold my children's hands at the playground. I'm merely suggesting that I be able to keep eyes on all three of them to make sure they are safe and not being bullied or otherwise getting into trouble that they can't handle by themselves.
And trust me, my kids' life isn't always fruit smoothies and Wii. In fact, one of the reasons I have to keep a close eye on my kiddos at the park is because I have a kid with autism, which manifests largely with social and communication deficits. It is just not safe to wish him well and send him off. When I try that? He gets eaten alive by other kids on the playground—and their parents, who are often intolerant of children who are different. I've tried to back off. I have. But experience has taught me that I can't. Bon appetit, indeed.
Elaine
11:13 pm on Tuesday, January 17, 2012
An essential part of a well-planned park for me is that I feel safe allowing my kids to roam free. When a park fails at this, it's hard to just read the New York Times and say "good luck" kids, I promise if you survive this you'll be a CEO someday. And, while I may know my own children well enough to know they will come back, I don't know that about their friends. So, if I'm responsible for anyone besides my own two children, this park is out. It's just too stressful. And if I had a child who was prone to running off or hiding? No way. Not worth the stress.
Tracy Keirns
11:22 pm on Tuesday, January 17, 2012
Seriously??? Ever dealt with a kid on the autism spectrum? Or one with a disability? How about one that has no sense of pain? One who is non-verbal or one who is extremely verbal and has never met a stranger? The one who is always singled out and picked on because they are weird, or different or are thought to be a "retard"? Having a child with a disability changes your perspective about everything.
I know that Jean allows her children to explore, imagine and play to their hearts content BUT she also watches them when they are in social situations that go beyond what they have internalized as typical ways to interact in this specific location.
Jean is doing over and above what can be done to provide all three of her children with the opportunities to "stretch their boundaries" and find challenges in their day to day world.
Marie ciliberti
11:33 pm on Tuesday, January 17, 2012
You are a totally normal mom and necessarily cautious in this sometimes dangerous world as you teeter on the line between being naturally protective and trying to expand your children's horizons. Montgomery County is challenging enough for adults to live in without having a public park filled with pitfalls & dangers that the parent has no control over. And when you're a grandmother with a 30-mile-an-hour jumping, climbing, rolling grandson, it's doubly difficult to see a potentially joyful experience turn into a stress test. Agree with Elaine's comments above.
Tom Termini
9:58 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012
Not sure why EMILY SUDBRINK chose to email me directly, but here's what she wrote,
"Tom, I don't think you are really thinking this through - I'm sure this isn't true, but it sounds like you would think it would be okay to raise your kids to knock down people who are blind and steal their money, because after all, people with blindness are easier targets? Surely you aren't advocating taking advantage of another person's disability? That would be pretty immoral, and I'm sure you aren't advocating raising immoral children? Parents of children with autism have to be more vigilant than other parents, because their children's brains are wired differently than nypicals. Children with autism process the world differently, so they will do things that nypicals might not expect, and get into situations where they could be seriously hurt. At the same time, children with autism really need fresh air and exercise. It would be nice if parks were a little more sensitive to helping parents keep track of their kids who are more vulnerable because of their neurological differences. That is what Jean is talking about. Open your eyes Tom!"
I was going to comment, but why risk further wrath from more self-entitled, overly narcissistic stay-at-home moms who wouldnt think of giving little Billy (or Sky, or Bannanwilly) a bit of breathing room from their claustrophobic Electra-like smothering?
Jean Winegardner
2:31 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012
My guess is that she wanted to try to talk to you and really reach you without forcing you to hash it out in public.
I think we're going to have to agree to disagree, but please don't assume that everyone who disagrees with you is the stereotypical mega-bad-mom you seem to have in your imagination. We're all trying to do our best. I hope that our children can find ways to get along and settle their differences with less name calling.
Kris Punga
11:33 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012
Wow. Let's take it easy on Tom. I liked the renovated Wheaton Park the one time I went there. I think it has a little bit of something for kids of all ages. Let's not turn this into a bashing kids with disabilites chat. If you find that Wheaton Park doesn't suit you and your kids, then go somewhere else.
Marian McBrine
1:04 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012
I think, the fundamental issue boils down to the fact that, not every park is going to work for every family. It just can't. Unless, I guess, it was fenced in and lined with Nerf material. This park just doesn't work for Jean and her kids; she has three kids, and one of them has special needs, so I can see that it would be very difficult for her to mange her kids there. For me, with one kid, without special needs, it works very well, and I enjoy that he has a wide open space to run in a bit, that they have the kiddie swings he needs right now, and I appreciate that the park HAS the things we had in our youth, like climbing areas, that all too often nowadays are removed for safety reasons. Probably at some point he will fall off those onto the fairly soft mulch below, but didn't we all pretty much fall off monkey bars onto hard asphalt when we were kids? I don't mean to say in any way that kids should be actively excluded, but I think it's ok that we have lots of different parks in the area, and I think this one works great for some people, and not for others, and I'm ok with that because we have many parks, to accomodate many kinds of kids.
Jean Winegardner
2:25 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012
I think you're absolutely right that no park works for all people. You're also right that there are lots of other parks to go to, which I am grateful for. (Although that mostly applies to people with easy access to cars.) My kids definitely fall off of stuff all the time, and that's okay. I just want to be able to see them to know it happened and be able to get to them quicker. That probably means I'll stay away from Wheaton Regional for now. But if ever there is a warm, sunny day and I only have one of my kids with me? I'll see you at the playground! :)
Andrea Lightman
3:36 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012
I have to say that as a parent and an early child special educator, I found the title to this hilarious! Mostly, because my husband and I have taken my daughter to this park twice and, for a parent of a little toddler, it is SCARY. But my little spicy lady loves to climb on everything and so we follow her around and climb along with her. Yep, even on that big spider web looking thing. I think the park is a lot of fun and some of the equipment is great but I would love to know who they consulted with when deciding upon the safety aspects of certain areas, especially those HUGE holes by the slides for “rock climbing.”
Come on, I’m not a helicopter mom and I’m not a SAHM but I am responsible and I am a mom and it is very challenging to keep track of a 2-3 foot tall running machine at this place. Everyone has different ways of parenting but please don’t accuse someone of being overprotective when they want to keep an eye on their child, regardless of a disability.
And I’m sure Montgomery County will have to make some changes when someone finally falls off the ledge by that slide and breaks something. It will happen eventually. In the meantime, enjoy the adventure of Wheaton’s Adventure Playground.
Jean Winegardner
6:31 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012
Great comment. Yes. This.
Leslie Berlin Clesner
12:50 pm on Thursday, January 19, 2012
I miss the old playground. I will say, the first (and only time so far) we went to the newly renovated playground, I freaked for a second when I saw the "hole" in the wall, wondering why it was there and where it went. It scared the *%^# out of me for a second and it wasn't until I had to walk all the way around the place that I saw the other side was for "wall" climbing. I do think some of the new equipment is fun, but one thing I loved about the old playground was the imagination it gave to my kids pretending it was Diego's Animal Rescue Center or the like. The trees seem to be missing. I agree that it's definitely not easy to sit and chat with friends while watching your kids at the park now, and I personally miss the blue slide. I never understood why they took that down. I thought it was much easier to sit back and watch at the old playground than at the new, but I guess as my 3 kids get a little older, it will be a little easier. Let's just hope they don't jump through the "hole."
lilkunta
1:06 pm on Thursday, January 19, 2012
jean i think the renovate WRP is terrific & terrifying. You have valid points in your fears for your autustic kid, but we all dont have autistic kids. I know WRP was renovated to allow wheelchair kids to play.MoCo told of us their plans http://www.montgomeryparks.org/pdd/projects/wheaton-adventure_playground.shtm
, had meetings, had it on the county website; why didnt you speak up then & tell them you didnt like the hole or the pipe or the fence. Now it is AFTER , the millions have been spent. MoCo $ is so tight that they are stupidly taxing bags! Unless you are able to get David Rubenstein to donate to again renovate WRP, Adventure Playground will be this way for 20yrs.
Jean Winegardner
10:04 pm on Thursday, January 19, 2012
You're totally right, I didn't participate in the process. (I also wasn't aware of it.) And, yes, the playground will stay the way it is. And, yes, it is WONDERFUL that it is wheelchair accessible. And it is a really fun park. But I think anyone with multiple kids, disabled or not, will have a hard time keeping track of everyone there. But I think mostly you're right—it's both wonderful and not wonderful, like most things in life, there's a little of both.
Shawn Punga
3:24 pm on Tuesday, January 24, 2012
Here's your chance for input on future parks.
http://wheaton-md.patch.com/events/down-county-open-house-on-park-recreation-and-open-space-pros-plan-update
I'll be there looking to raise more biking opportunities for all ages, such as riding on natural surface trails, skills parks and pump tracks as ways to get more people out having fun on their bikes. I'll also be asking for more pocket parks in within neighborhoods so that major roads such as Georgia and University Blvd don't need to be crossed in order for children to get them.
JCobb
11:37 am on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
Just saw this post. Went to the playground recently and didn't see the issues others saw. I didn't bring three kids, though, just two. Had a blast. Easy enough to chase around two (chalk it up as my daily exercise). Three could be more challenging depending on their behavior. In any case, fantastic redesign of the playground. Highly recommend it.
Lesley Gramaglia
12:22 pm on Sunday, April 8, 2012
We've been to the Wheaton park and I think it is a beautifully designed, modern space. I do recall thinking, "this is not a park for small children." My 9 and 11 year old children love it and are thrilled to have structures suitable for their size and capabilities. It's so nice to see lots of other "older" children enjoying the park, laughing and getting some exercise. Some of the other playgrounds in our community are clearly intended for younger children and I think this offers great opportunities to kids of all ages. Personally, when I had younger children, I found going to any playground difficult because I had to keep a constant eye on them. I don't think Wheaton is so bad....have you been to the Clemyjontri park in Mclean???? That is a neat playground but it's impossible to keep track of your kids! We all have to find what works for our kids and our own sense of safety and independence. I'm happy that the county designed something with older kids in mind, and happy that Wheaton got some attention.