County Council Focuses Redevelopment on Park & Planning Headquarters

The Montgomery County Council held a straw vote in favor of a plan for Wheaton's downtown that funds a new M-NCPPC headquarters office building and a town square.

A new headquarters for Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission on Parking Lot 13 will be the centerpiece of public investment in Wheaton’s new downtown, as the Montgomery County Council voted this morning to push the public-private partnership with developer B.F. Saul and County Executive Isiah Leggett’s plans for the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority bus bay site into the background.

“The council is not discounting that particular component of the revitalization process, simply changing the phasing of it so that we can have a bit more certainty in a market that right now, obviously, is quite tight and uncertain,” Council Vice President Nancy Navarro said.

Over the past few weeks, Montgomery County Council staff have worked to reconcile these two plans for the sequencing of Wheaton redevelopment in the county budget, and Tuesday morning it became clear that the council would not see eye to eye with Leggett.

With a unanimous straw vote, the council acted on the recommendation of council staff and the Planning, Housing, and Economic Development Committee. PHED Chairperson Nancy Floreen called the proposal a “very inclusive approach” that “keeps the door open” for Leggett’s plans in the future.

“The bus bays are a significant site, but they are the most challenging and expensive redevelopment site in downtown Wheaton,” Senior Legislative Analyst Jacob Sesker said. “The redevelopment of Parking Lot 13 and the town center, with an office building headquarters for Park and Planning, along with what is going on with the Safeway project, the Lowes building...will change the market downtown, and it may make getting a platform cheaper for us at some point in the future. It may not.”

Building the M-NCPPC headquarters would be a more predictable and controllable investment in Wheaton, he added. “There are far fewer unknowns when it comes to the public sector building a building that the public sector will occupy (occupy alone and presumably own) than there are with a complex public-private partnership that involves WMATA and involves several pieces of property and several different conveyances,” Sesker said.

Although Sesker told the council repeatedly that his proposal does not preclude development of the WMATA site or partnership with B.F. Saul, Department of General Services Director David Dise said that “without the platform, there will be no possibility of enticing a private sector tenant or a federal tenant” because of the timeframe.

But the council would rather see “feet on the ground” in Wheaton sooner than later, and perhaps wait for market conditions to improve before working with a private developer on the WMATA site.

“One of my concerns about the existing proposal [Leggett’s] is that the weaker the market is for private investment in Wheaton, the more the county has to pay to get this development, and it is feasible to imagine a bus bay project in the future that will cost the county a lot less money because there will be more money to be made in Wheaton for the private investor,” Councilmember Hans Riemer said.

“And all the money that we spend on that is money we can’t spend on things that the private sector will never do. And that is why my fundamental concern is that we should try to focus our investment on things that only the public sector can do,” Riemer added.

Danila Sheveiko April 19, 2012 at 10:25 PM
Check out the uploaded image above of the Acros International Hall in Fukuoka, Japan. We could have a similar configuration on Lot 13, with a green pyramid Park & Planning building that would merge into an open piazza-type town square like Piazza del Campo in Siena, Italy. We could actually make Lot 13 a cool place, people!
Commentous April 19, 2012 at 10:55 PM
I agree that the Hall is wonderful, beautiful, and interesting. It is also incredibly expensive and way beyond what anyone would do for Wheaton, especially as we are reminded by the Council of their vital role in ensuring the wise use of tax dollars. In 1994, this building cost $380 million, which is more than $575 million today. Perhaps the building designer can take a few things here and there from Acros. I do want an inviting design, now that it seems we're stuck with the building, but I'm not sure there's going to be a lot in common with Acros when the M-NCPPC building is completed. I really am hopeful for an interesting design that looks modern and (in terms of environmental efficiency) is efficient and wows residents and newcomers alike. If the architect can create mini-Acros for one-tenth of the cost of the real Acros, I'm all for it. Otherwise, we will need to work long and hard with all relevant parties to try to ensure a cool town square with much more limited funds.
Danila Sheveiko April 20, 2012 at 03:03 AM
Hey, Commentous! Thanks for the costing insight on Acros. The Lot 13 building would be significantly smaller, plus in Japan they have a construction overhead for earthquakes and tsunamis. Additionally, there are studies that show green building technologies, like LEED, do not appreciably increase construction costs while decreasing operating and HVAC costs. For example, a green roof may cost twice as much as a regular roof, but it lasts two-three times longer, saves major mulah on cooling costs, and helps prevent stormwater pollution that we spend billions dealing with after it gets into the Bay and kills the fishing industry. The best thing the County can do now is to start the public input into the Lot 13 project ASAP. I've participated in the BF Saul charettes and people have all kinds of cool ideas out there for a Wheaton that is vibrant and unique!
Kathleen Michels May 06, 2012 at 03:54 AM
I love the idea of a VISIBLY Green mncppc building . Just like that HGTV show that designs at the high end then implements the details for a fraction of the original price Don't let perceived cost stifle the visibly green urban vision.We can transform wheaton into a model and destination for urban greening
Randall Spadoni May 05, 2013 at 03:33 AM
Danila, you should add your Acros idea to the engage Montgomery forum on Wheaton Redevelopment. I love the idea! http://engage.montgomerycountymd.gov/wheaton-redevelopment


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »